A Closer Look: Temperature and Drought in the Southwest
This feature provides a closer look at temperature and drought trends in the southwestern United States.
Figure 1. Average Temperatures in the Southwestern United States, 2000–2020 Versus Long-Term Average
This map shows how the average air temperature from 2000 to 2020 has differed from the long-term average. To provide more detailed information, each state has been divided into climate divisions, which are zones that share similar climate features.
Climate Division ID
T Anomaly
201
1.678439
202
1.592989
203
1.869312
204
1.947751
205
1.958532
206
1.994577
207
1.631548
401
1.340741
402
1.258267
403
1.416931
404
1.68459
405
1.569709
406
2.101058
407
1.84623
501
1.343651
502
1.893783
503
1.560317
504
1.499339
505
1.501521
2601
1.33254
2602
1.333267
2603
1.927513
2604
1.770899
2901
1.533003
2902
1.466336
2903
1.546362
2904
1.517659
2905
1.803439
2906
1.849206
2907
1.865079
2908
1.710847
4201
1.41832
4202
1.531415
4203
1.503042
4204
1.641336
4205
1.655159
4206
2.066799
4207
1.926124
Figure 1. Average Temperatures in the Southwestern United States, 2000-2020 Versus Long-Term Average Data source: NOAA, 2021 Web update: April 2021 Units: °F
Figure 2. Southwestern US land in drought conditions, 2000–2020
This graph shows the percentage of land area in six southwestern states classified as drought conditions from 2000 to 2020.
This figure uses the US Drought Monitor classification system, which is described in the table in the Drought indicator.
Figure 3. Drought Severity in the Southwestern United States, 1895–2020
This graph shows annual Palmer Drought Severity Index values, averaged over six states in the Southwest. Positive values represent wetter-than-average conditions, while negative values represent drier-than-average conditions.
A value between -2 and -3 indicates moderate drought, -3 to -4 severe drought, and -4 or lower indicates extreme drought. The thicker line is the nine-year weighted average.
Year
Annual avg
9-yr avg
1895
1.849027
1.454559
1896
0.704427
1.08735
1897
1.191038
0.615365
1898
-0.1779
0.068471
1899
-0.39817
-0.48127
1900
-1.43943
-0.91824
1901
-1.0748
-1.12975
1902
-1.8819
-1.01743
1903
-0.44792
-0.47773
1904
-0.79754
0.520729
1905
2.316924
1.735053
1906
4.006448
2.620259
1907
4.187675
2.719562
1908
1.519302
2.088573
1909
1.552336
1.230651
1910
-1.08543
0.654565
1911
0.801013
0.532024
1912
0.948632
0.738068
1913
0.445492
1.116917
1914
1.587472
1.533911
1915
2.80687
1.733289
1916
2.286936
1.490974
1917
0.539478
0.969758
1918
-0.80849
0.621108
1919
0.772883
0.65229
1920
1.701148
0.835784
1921
0.713799
0.870428
1922
0.686291
0.66196
1923
1.210943
0.274798
1924
-1.24266
-0.12064
1925
-0.51045
-0.32344
1926
-0.49276
-0.31697
1927
0.605195
-0.29249
1928
-0.79694
-0.37457
1929
-0.56495
-0.47047
1930
-0.70299
-0.45322
1931
-0.5523
-0.41154
1932
0.867048
-0.60023
1933
-0.86314
-1.04849
1934
-3.65509
-1.37934
1935
-0.88246
-1.24517
1936
-0.68494
-0.77025
1937
-0.02268
-0.34263
1938
0.703698
-0.08234
1939
-1.15948
0.319956
1940
-0.59787
1.10122
1941
4.884364
1.866003
1942
3.421335
1.973864
1943
0.009883
1.407214
1944
0.455919
0.699373
1945
0.611597
0.200299
1946
-0.60812
-0.07464
1947
-0.65078
-0.18608
1948
0.281362
-0.26199
1949
0.427246
-0.44028
1950
-1.90733
-0.64605
1951
-1.26909
-0.74918
1952
0.990164
-0.89556
1953
-1.47573
-1.27626
1954
-2.71615
-1.68583
1955
-2.10567
-1.68803
1956
-2.26007
-1.17825
1957
0.640011
-0.59207
1958
1.613652
-0.46116
1959
-2.23071
-0.78272
1960
-1.81776
-1.07596
1961
-1.00495
-1.06293
1962
-0.15353
-0.88601
1963
-1.16324
-0.67135
1964
-1.44346
-0.36965
1965
1.65704
-0.0354
1966
-0.362
0.168019
1967
0.40188
0.233442
1968
-0.16445
0.274253
1969
0.917798
0.301037
1970
0.191916
0.263611
1971
0.191053
0.213655
1972
-0.76038
0.21754
1973
2.0015
0.177439
1974
-1.01519
-0.07747
1975
0.450556
-0.51733
1976
-1.59715
-0.7942
1977
-2.88982
-0.5195
1978
1.32384
0.199699
1979
2.489501
0.76001
1980
1.273309
0.894993
1981
-1.78798
1.08263
1982
1.654211
1.718084
1983
4.928407
2.409097
1984
2.604381
2.54667
1985
2.133221
2.075625
1986
1.289717
1.315849
1987
0.598719
0.453349
1988
0.000478
-0.4409
1989
-2.2439
-1.12414
1990
-2.47781
-1.24566
1991
-0.9459
-0.75042
1992
0.390576
-0.03403
1993
2.169748
0.44906
1994
-1.20071
0.611761
1995
2.069136
0.665522
1996
-0.19144
0.785423
1997
0.591696
0.893114
1998
3.018517
0.67969
1999
-0.15298
-0.05649
2000
-1.96089
-1.10758
2001
-1.62713
-2.01229
2002
-3.93348
-2.34964
2003
-3.05733
-1.9297
2004
-1.05479
-1.06309
2005
2.426283
-0.49339
2006
-0.59901
-0.66201
2007
-2.39049
-1.20632
2008
-1.96468
-1.45387
2009
-2.18352
-1.24052
2010
0.85808
-1.05107
2011
-0.08337
-1.38006
2012
-3.46147
-2.09045
2013
-3.43208
-2.57374
2014
-3.08341
-2.45951
2015
-1.65772
-1.93939
2016
-0.9844
-1.45011
2017
-0.173
-1.22599
2018
-3.09029
-1.22209
2019
0.792746
-1.37285
2020
-2.3603
-1.67669
Figure 3. Drought Severity in the Southwestern United States, 1895-2020 Data source: NOAA, 2021 Web update: April 2021 Units: Palmer Drought Severity Index
Key Points
Every part of the Southwest experienced warmer average temperatures than the long-term average between 2000 and 2020. Some areas were more than 2°F warmer than average (see Figure 1).
Large parts of the Southwest have experienced drought since weekly drought monitoring records began in 2000.
For long periods from 2002 to 2005 and from 2012 to 2020, nearly the entire region was abnormally dry or even drier (see Figure 2).
Based on the long-term Palmer index, drought conditions in the Southwest have varied since 1895. Since the early 20th century, the Southwest has experienced wetter conditions in three main periods: the 20th century, the 1940s, and the 1980s.
Drier conditions occurred in the 1920s/1930s in the 1950s, again in the 1950s, and since 1990, when the Southwest experienced some of the longest droughts on record (see Figure 3).
Background
The American Southwest might conjure up images of a hot, dry landscape—a land of rocks, canyons, and sun-scorched deserts. In fact, much of this region has low annual rainfall and seasonally high temperatures that contribute to its characteristic desert climate.
Yet this landscape actually supports a vast array of plants and animals, along with the millions of people who call the Southwest home. All these plants, animals, and people need water to survive.
Water is already scarce in the Southwest, so every drop is a precious resource. People in the Southwest are particularly dependent on surface water supplies like Lake Mead, which are prone to evaporation.
Thus, even a small increase in temperature or decrease in precipitation in this already arid region can seriously threaten natural systems and society.
Droughts also contribute to increased pests and wildfires, which harm local economies and reduce the amount of water available for electricity generation—for example, at the Hoover Dam.
While the two indicators in this report present information on unusually high or low temperatures and drought nationwide, this feature highlights the Southwest because of its particular sensitivity to temperature and drought.
Parts of the Southwest are also experiencing long-term reductions in mountain snowpack, which makes up much of the region’s water supply. This feature focuses on six states that are commonly considered “Southwestern” and that are characterized at least in part by arid landscapes and insufficient water supplies: Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah.
Temperature and drought data come from a network of thousands of weather stations overseen by the National Weather Service.
The map in Figure 1 shows how mean annual temperatures in the Southwest between 2000 and 2020 have differed from the mean over the entire period since extensive temperature records have been available.
Figures 2 and 3 show two ways of measuring drought in the Southwest: the Drought Monitor and the Palmer Drought Severity Index. The Palmer index is calculated from precipitation and temperature measurements at meteorological stations and has been widely used for many years.
The Drought Monitor is a newer and more detailed index based on several other indices, along with other factors such as snow water content, water table, reservoir storage, pasture/mountain range conditions, and other impacts.
About the Data
Notes
Natural variability, changes in irrigation practices, and other diversions of water for human use can affect some drought-related measurements.
Soil moisture, groundwater, and streamflow are included in the drought monitoring calculations (Figure 2) and are all sensitive to human activities.
Data Sources
Data for Figures 1 and 3 were obtained from the National Center for Environmental Information of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Data for Figure 2 is provided by the National Drought Mitigation Center.